 |
Watch Online Videos |
 |
|
Video Categories |
|
|
 |
Videos Results: Who signed the constitution |
 |
|
Total Number Results: 965
| |  | Australian Constitution for Dummies 4/4
Author: chotaboy66
Length: 8 minutes, 18 seconds
Rating: 5.0  | Description: DOWNLOAD DVD Format 422 MB.Zip. Fast Direct. www.thecrowhouse.com Visit the Crowhouse get it Direct. www.thecrowhouse.com Massmirror Slow. massmirror.com ------------------------------ The Voice of The Australian Constitution larryhannigan.com Its not hard learn your rights guys and once you know th...More Description: DOWNLOAD DVD Format 422 MB.Zip. Fast Direct. www.thecrowhouse.com Visit the Crowhouse get it Direct. www.thecrowhouse.com Massmirror Slow. massmirror.com ------------------------------ The Voice of The Australian Constitution larryhannigan.com Its not hard learn your rights guys and once you know them you will know you have the power not a criminal dictatorship. australianpolitics.com Read it ,love it ,breath it, and if any politician criminal plots to change it or tries remove it via illegal treaties without referendum its your duty as an AUSTRALIAN human being to expose them as criminals. Treaty agreements www.dfat.gov.au Quote: Although the Constitution does not confer on the Parliament any formal role in treaty making, all treaties (except those the Government decided are urgent or sensitive). BEWARE If politicians can stir enough fear via media propaganda wether its true or not they can play the urgent or sensitive card and pass laws via treaty that can be unjust and violate our constitution by deception which may result in restricting or removing our rights, civil liberty's and freedoms. EG: Global Warming/Terrorism A LESSON IN LAW AND THE CONSTITUTION. Before 1901 Australia did not exist as a nation. It was a collection of six British colonies which were partly self-governing, but under the law-making power of the British Parliament. 1901 Queen Victoria signed the " Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act " containing section <b>...</b> | | | | |  | Presidents & Congress Ignoring the Constitution - Judge Napolitano
Author: Acrinimiril
Length: 5 minutes, 10 seconds
Rating: 4.9759035   | Description: Is the government we have today what the founders had in mind? Everyone in government takes an oath to uphold the Constitution, but few do so. Beginning with John Adams, and proceeding to Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, and George W. Bush, congress has enacted and the President has signed laws that...More Description: Is the government we have today what the founders had in mind? Everyone in government takes an oath to uphold the Constitution, but few do so. Beginning with John Adams, and proceeding to Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, and George W. Bush, congress has enacted and the President has signed laws that have criminalized political speech, suspended Habeas Corpus, compelled support for war, forbade the freedom of contract, allowed the government to spy on Americans without a search warrant, and use tax payer dollars to shore up failing private banks. All of this legislation is so obviously in conflict with the plain words of the Constitution, that one wonders how Congress gets away with it. The truth is, that the Constitution grants Congress 17 specific delegated powers, and commands in the 9th and 10th Amendments, that the powers not articulated and thus not delegated by the Constitution to the Congress, must be reserved to the states and the people. What's more, Congress can only use it's delegated powers to legislate for what we call the general welfare. Meaning it cannot spend tax dollars on individuals or selected groups, but only for all of us. And, Congress cannot deny the equal protection of the laws, thus, it must treat similarly situated entities in a similar manner. It is clear that the framers wrote a constitution, as a result of which, contracts would be enforced, risk would be real, choices would be free and have consequences, and private property would be <b>...</b> | | | | |  | Is Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty? Join Us To Stop The Copenhagen Treaty!!!
Author: purldiver
Length: 4 minutes, 13 seconds
Rating: 3.6333334  | Description: Join Us On facebook To Put An End To This Madness www.facebook.com On October 14, Lord Christopher Monckton gave a presentation in St. Paul, MN on the subject of global warming. In this 4-minute excerpt from his speech, he issues a dire warning to all Americans regarding the United Nations Climate C...More Description: Join Us On facebook To Put An End To This Madness www.facebook.com On October 14, Lord Christopher Monckton gave a presentation in St. Paul, MN on the subject of global warming. In this 4-minute excerpt from his speech, he issues a dire warning to all Americans regarding the United Nations Climate Change Treaty that is scheduled to be signed in Copenhagen in December 2009. A draft of the treaty can be read here: www.globalclimatescam.com Page 18: Section 38 of the "Share vision for long-term cooperation action plan" contains the text for forming the new government. Page 44-45: Section 46 "Objectives, scope, and guiding principles" contains the text for enforcement and establishment of the rule of law. There has been considerable debate raised about Monckton's conclusion that the Copenhagen Treaty would cede US sovereignty. His comments appear to be based upon his interpretation of the The Supremacy Clause in the US Constitution (Article VI, paragraph 2). This clause establishes the Constitution, Federal Statutes, and US TREATIES as the supreme law of the land. Concerns have been raised in the past that a particularly ambitious treaty may supersede the US Constitution. In the 1950s, a constitutional amendment, known as the Bricker Amendment, was proposed in response to such fears, but it failed to pass. Lord Monckton served as a policy adviser to Margaret Thatcher. He has repeatedly challenged Al Gore to a debate to which Gore has refused. Monckton sued to stop Gore's film <b>...</b> | | | | |  | Faramarz Aslani "dar sokoti mandeh boodam naomid" "Mashrooteh Revolution"
Author: nima2480
Length: 4 minutes, 34 seconds
Rating: 4.8333335 | Description: In 1905, Iran was still under the rule of the Qajar Dynasty who had ruled Persia since 1781. Over the duration of Qajar rule, Persia had gradually become a victim of Russian and British imperial policies in The Great Game. This international rivalry had caused successive central governments to becom...More Description: In 1905, Iran was still under the rule of the Qajar Dynasty who had ruled Persia since 1781. Over the duration of Qajar rule, Persia had gradually become a victim of Russian and British imperial policies in The Great Game. This international rivalry had caused successive central governments to become increasingly weak and corrupt. The country's management was often handled by powerful regional nobles who paid their token respects to the monarchy. In effect, this resulted in the central government relying on these nobles for income, justice, and security. This was particularly true of the brief reign of Mozzafar-al-Din Shah (1896-1908), during whose rule the Constitutional Revolution began. Mozzafar-al-Din Shah often relied on his chancellor to manage his decentralized state, he had also taken out several major loans from Russia and Britain to pay for his extravagant lifestyle and the costs of the central government. Despite some attempts to reform the central treasury during his reign he was continually undermined by both Russia and Britain. His dire financial situation caused him to sign many concessions to foreign powers, an example being the D'arcy oil concession which provided oil to Britain for 60 years at an extremely low price. As concessions were granted with increasing frequency on an expanding list of trade items ranging from weapons to tobacco, the established noble classes, religious authorities, and educated elite began to demand a curb on royal authority and <b>...</b> | | | | |  | Australian Constitution [video 1/4]
Author: MightyMegaPhone
Length: 10 minutes, 47 seconds
Rating: 5.0 | Description: The Constitution of Australia is the supreme law under which the Australian Commonwealth Government operates. It consists of several documents. The most important is the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia. The Constitution was approved in referendums held over 18981900 by the people of th...More Description: The Constitution of Australia is the supreme law under which the Australian Commonwealth Government operates. It consists of several documents. The most important is the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia. The Constitution was approved in referendums held over 18981900 by the people of the Australian colonies, and the approved draft was enacted as a section of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (Imp), an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The Commission of Assent was signed by Queen Victoria on 9 July 1900, upon which the Constitution became law. The Constitution came into force on 1 January 1901. Even though the Constitution was originally given legal force by an Act of the United Kingdom parliament, the Australia Acts removed the power of the United Kingdom parliament to change the Constitution, and only the Australian people can amend it (by referendum). Other pieces of legislation have constitutional significance for Australia. These are the Statute of Westminster, as adopted by the Commonwealth in the Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942, and the Australia Act 1986, which was passed in equivalent forms by the Parliaments of every Australian state, the United Kingdom, and the Australian Federal Parliament. Together, these Acts had the effect of severing all constitutional links between Australia and the United Kingdom. Even though the same person, Queen Elizabeth II, is the monarch of both countries, she acts in a distinct <b>...</b> | | | | |  | The Lisbon Treaty (EU Constitution) explained
Author: JustProud1
Length: 3 minutes, 47 seconds
Rating: 4.571429 | Description: In June 2005, the French and Dutch electorates both rejected the EU Constitution in a referenda. However when a new 'Reform Treaty' was drafted and signed in Lisbon, 2007, which is now known as the Lisbon Treaty it was simply a reformulation of the original Eu constitution. Proposed innovations incl...More Description: In June 2005, the French and Dutch electorates both rejected the EU Constitution in a referenda. However when a new 'Reform Treaty' was drafted and signed in Lisbon, 2007, which is now known as the Lisbon Treaty it was simply a reformulation of the original Eu constitution. Proposed innovations include: 1) Centralisation of EU power 2) Granting the EU a legal personality 3) Creating a President and single Foreign policy post - (President Herman Von Rompuy and Foreign Minister Catherine Ashton, former member of CND) 4) New powers for the European Parliament 5) Extending ECJ powers into Home Affairs 6) Making the Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFR) legally binding 7) New powers to harmonise national legal systems - It gives the unelected EU Commission greater say over foreign and home affairs. This challenges the principle that sovereign states should have control over these important policy areas. - The UK will not be able to use its veto to block future changes in an increasing number of areas, potentially even those in which it currently has an opt-out. - The treaty would make the EU an international actor in its own right, separate from, and superior to, its Member States. It turns what was an international agreement into something more like a single state. - The EU Commission will remain answerable solely to the European Council and not directly to any EU citizens, as would the new President. (Dictatorial not Democratic) - The ECJ will gain jurisdiction in a range of <b>...</b> | | | | |  | Ron Paul Autographs the Constitution, Twice
Author: IowaIndependent
Length: 28 seconds
Rating: 4.84375 | Description: www.iowaindependent.com Ron Paul didn't write the Constitution, but that didn't stop a young man wearing an Al Franken for Senate t-shirt from getting Paul's signature on a couple copies of the Constitution. When the young man said he wanted to send one of the signed documents to his government teac...More Description: www.iowaindependent.com Ron Paul didn't write the Constitution, but that didn't stop a young man wearing an Al Franken for Senate t-shirt from getting Paul's signature on a couple copies of the Constitution. When the young man said he wanted to send one of the signed documents to his government teacher, Paul instructed him to ask his teacher about Article 1, Section 8. http | | | | |  | Alexander Hamilton
Author: peacemun1993
Length: 3 minutes, 26 seconds
Rating: 5.0 | Description: Alexander Hamilton Alexander Hamilton (January 11, 1755 or 1757 July 12, 1804) was the first United States Secretary of the Treasury, a Founding Father, economist, and political philosopher. Aide-de-camp to General George Washington during the American Revolutionary War, he was a leader of nationali...More Description: Alexander Hamilton Alexander Hamilton (January 11, 1755 or 1757 July 12, 1804) was the first United States Secretary of the Treasury, a Founding Father, economist, and political philosopher. Aide-de-camp to General George Washington during the American Revolutionary War, he was a leader of nationalist forces calling for a new Constitution; he was one of America's first lawyers, and wrote most of the Federalist Papers, a primary source for Constitutional interpretation. He was the financial expert of Washington's administration; the Federalist Party formed to support his policies. Born and raised in the Caribbean, Hamilton attended King's College (now Columbia University) in New York. At the start of the American Revolutionary War, he organized an artillery company and was chosen as its captain. Hamilton became the senior[1] aide-de-camp and confidant to General George Washington, the American commander-in-chief. After the war, Hamilton was elected to the Continental Congress from New York, but he resigned to practice law and to found the Bank of New York. He served in the New York Legislature, and he was the only New Yorker who signed the US Constitution. He wrote about half the Federalist Papers, which secured its ratification by New York; they are still the most important unofficial interpretation of the Constitution. In the new government under President Washington he became Secretary of the Treasury. An admirer of British political systems, Hamilton was a nationalist <b>...</b> | | | | |  | Star Trek: Legends of the Constitution
Author: RifleMan80
Length: 7 minutes, 32 seconds
Rating: 4.60274 | Description: MERRY LATE CHRISTMAS!! HAPPY NEW YEAR! Happy Holidays to ALL of my viewers!!! signed rifleman80
Description: MERRY LATE CHRISTMAS!! HAPPY NEW YEAR! Happy Holidays to ALL of my viewers!!! signed rifleman80 | | | | |  | Constitution? What Constitution? Andrew Napolitano Gives us the Verdict
Author: PopulistParty
Length: 5 minutes, 10 seconds
Rating: 4.9714284 | Description: Is the government we have today what the founders had in mind? Everyone in government takes an oath to uphold the Constitution, but few do so. Beginning with John Adams, and proceeding to Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, and George W. Bush, congress has enacted and the President has signed laws that...More Description: Is the government we have today what the founders had in mind? Everyone in government takes an oath to uphold the Constitution, but few do so. Beginning with John Adams, and proceeding to Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, and George W. Bush, congress has enacted and the President has signed laws that have criminalized political speech, suspended Habeas Corpus, compelled support for war, forbade the freedom of contract, allowed the government to spy on Americans without a search warrant, and use tax payer dollars to shore up failing private banks. All of this legislation is so obviously in conflict with the plain words of the Constitution, that one wonders how Congress gets away with it. The truth is, that the Constitution grants Congress 17 specific delegated powers, and commands in the 9th and 10th Amendments, that the powers not articulated and thus not delegated by the Constitution to the Congress, must be reserved to the states and the people. What's more, Congress can only use it's delegated powers to legislate for what we call the general welfare. Meaning it cannot spend tax dollars on individuals or selected groups, but only for all of us. And, Congress cannot deny the equal protection of the laws, thus, it must treat similarly situated entities in a similar manner. It is clear that the framers wrote a constitution, as a result of which, contracts would be enforced, risk would be real, choices would be free and have consequences, and private property would be <b>...</b> | | |
|
|
|
